Ferdinand Marcos: NOT A HERO

For God knows what reason, the debate regarding the burial of former President Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani has been re-opened for the nth time. I am on the anti side.

I am against it simply because the Libingan ng mga Bayani is a burial site commemorating the heroism of Filipino heroes who lived noble lives and most of whom sacrificed themselves to advance the rights of the Filipino people and to fight for and uphold the democracy of the Philippines.

Is Ferdinand Marcos a hero? Of course not. He might have been a president and he might have served the interests of a very select segment of the population (ie his family and friends) but he did nothing heroic. He plundered the country and ignored basic human rights.

Another argument of those for the burial of Marcos in the Libingan ng mga Bayani contend that he should be buried there simply because he was the president. What they fail to realize, however, that being president is not enough to become a hero. More than the position one holds, is how he uses the power given to him. Do we simply herald him a hero by burying him there just because he was the president? I hope not.

Does Ferdinand Marcos deserve to be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani? OF COURSE NOT! Doing so, would not only be wrong, but it would be an insult. It would be an insult to the millions of Filipinos who died and suffered during the Martial Law Regime. And more importantly, doing so would be an insult to the memory of real heroes who are buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani.

Ferdinand Marcos was never a hero. No matter what his family and friends believe, Ferdinand Marcos had never, does not and will never deserve to be buried in the Libingan ng mga Bayani.

Non-SONA 2005

Once again, the president has failed to address the following issues during her SONA this year:
1.) Environmental concerns: waste management, biodiversity conservation, illegal logging
2.) Support for and development of the entertainment industry
3.) Population control
4.) Social welfare
5.) Brain drain
6.) Wage/Salary increase
7.) Financial aid and technological support for the agriculture industry
8.) Curbing corruption
9.) Electoral reforms
10.) Reform of the penitentiary system
11.) Science and technology research funding and support

SONA 2005

GMA (President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo): Every year, we meet on this day in this great hall to celebrate democracy and take stock of the nation: the country and its condition; the government and its performance; the people and their well-being.
MJ (Citizen Maria Jose): Or most likely, be fed euphemisms, exaggerated achievements and empty promises.

GMA: Ours is a country divided; the story of our nation is a tale of two Philippines; Almost, as it were, two countries under the same name.
MJ: I wonder whose fault that is?

GMA: One is the Philippines whose economy, after long years of cumulative national endeavor, is now poised for take off.
MJ: We have been poised for take off years ago but said take off was hindered by the Asian Economic Crisis and mismanagement of politicians. But now? Are we still poised for take off? Maybe in some people’s dreams. Wake up and smell the stink of garbage, most of our countrymen still live on land they do not own, wallow in misery and spend their lives wishing they could go abroad to earn dollars, dinars, euros, etc, etc, etc!

GMA: The other is the Philippines whose political system, after equally long years of degeneration, has become a hindrance to progress.
MJ: Which begs the question is the problem really the political system or the selfish, self-serving, arrogant politicians behind it? Are we really to believe that the problem is institutional rather than cultural?

GMA: As a country on the verge of take-off, our storyline would surprise many at home and abroad. The story includes an economy that grew more than 6 percent last year and that has continued to work in the teeth of the biggest oil price hikes in history, while generating four million jobs in the last four years.
MJ: And now you think you deserve a pat on the back. Isn’t that your job anyway? By the way, did the Filipino really hire you? Or you cheated your way to the Palace?

GMA: The story includes marked improvements in tax collections, infrastructure housing construction, shelter, security for the urban poor and indigenous peoples, and rice productivity.
MJ: Where’s the proof of marked improvements in tax collections? Where’s the infrastructure? Where’s the increased salaries of government employees, specifically of public school teachers? Pardon my ignorance but are you sure that these “accomplishments” are felt all over the country? Or maybe just within the confines of Metro Manila?

GMA: The story includes 69 million beneficiaries of health care insurance, including 30 million indigents, whose re-enrollment started early this year and is still ongoing.
MJ: You mean the PhilHealth System which you blatantly used as a campaign tool last year?

GMA: That same story, over four years, saw the drug menace cut in half, the rash of kidnappings become a thing of the past, and insurgency in the South abated.
MJ: Mrs. Arroyo are you sure you are talking of the Philippines and not some imaginary country you conjured in your head?

GMA: This story should work itself out as one about an economy as resilient and full of potential as its people are patient and hardworking, guided by a government–with the executive and the legislative hand-in-hand–that is able to pass a no-nonsense budget and make the tough decisions to put our fiscal house in order.
MJ: For once I agree with you, the Filipino people are hardworking. But I beg to differ on other points. Does the executive and legislative working hand-in-hand include personally persuading congressmen to vote your way regarding the VAT law amendments? Does your “no-nonsense budget” include perhaps implementing the Comprehensive Solid Waste Mangement Act or providing jobs to the countless unemployed and underemployed Filipinos or improving the public education system?

GMA: I specially refer to our recent titanic struggle to enact the three laws that comprised the biggest fiscal package in our history, the biggest revenue increase in a generation that will break the vicious cycle of financing development by borrowing and having to borrow again just to service those loans. This is the one reform that will snap the chain that has bound our future to a profligate past and the debt-burdened present. The Filipino’s strong sense of family has given Congress a stronger resolve not to pass on today’s debt, and bankrupt our children and grandchildren tomorrow. That struggle has done the House and the Senate great honor. Congratulations.
MJ: Great honor for the House and the Senate in whose eyes? Who are the people patting your back? Is it the millions of Filipinos living under the poverty line who are forced to suffer even more?

GMA: Abroad, the story continues. We’ve worked long and hard to restore our country to the prominent place it once held as co-founder of the United Nations and the Free World’s first line of defense in the East. We won a seat in the UN Security Council, where we presided over the landmark resolution calling for democracy in Iraq. The Philippines chaired the historic conference on interfaith cooperation for peace at the UN, the fruit of a bold and creative initiative by your Speaker of the House.
MJ: Does that “prominent place” mean to be the travel advisories which has turned off tourists and investors?

GMA: We head the APEC anti-terrorism task force. Our victories in the war on terror have been acknowledged by no less than president Bush before the US National Defense University. The Jemaah Islamiyah and the Abu Sayyaf can only pick up the pieces of its broken backbone in Mindanao.
MJ: Awww… WE SHOULD BE PROUD THAT THE GREAT AMERICAN PRESIDENT BUSH HAS ACKNOWLEDGED US!!!

GMA: We’ve worked with the Organization of the Islamic Conference to forge peace with our Muslim brothers. Eighty percent of our peace talks with them have been completed. Permanent peace in Mindanao is within reach.
MJ: Forging peace = Aggressive military offensives ???

GMA: Indeed, our story as a country on the verge of take off is real. Analysts need only to look at our stock market, and even the peso-dollar exchange rate, to sense the strong anticipation of significant improvements, if only we would overcome the tendency to be our own worst enemy.
MJ: Are you living in a bubble of fantasy? FYI, the peso-dollar exchange is currently at about P56.

GMA: Thus, with investors both here and abroad in mind, i invite you all to join me in sending them a strong message from this great hall: We will not waver in our commitment to economic reform and fiscal discipline, whatever the political cost.
MJ: Easy for you to say, you have got nothing more to gain politically.

GMA:The other message to send is that we will address the burden that the other Philippine story imposes on our anticipated take-off. I refer to the story of how our political system has now become a hindrance to our national progress.
MJ: Once again, the problems lies within politicIANS and not on the system.

GMA: Over the years, our political system has degenerated to the extent that it is difficult for anyone to make any headway yet keep his hands clean.
MJ: Are you speaking from experience???

GMA: To be sure, the system is still capable of achieving great reforms. But, by and large, our political system has betrayed its promise to each new generation of Filipinos, not a few of whom are voting with their feet, going abroad and leaving that system behind.
MJ: I hate sounding like a sirang plaka but (once again, with feelings) the problem is the politicians themselves not the system.

GMA: Perhaps we politicians have done our best; But maybe our best is not enough, given the present system. Perhaps we have strained the present political system to its final limit.
It is time to turn to the people, bring them into government — and change the way that government is done.

MJ: Does the politicians’ best consist of lying, cheating and stealing? If yes, then we are a helpless country destined for nothing but self-destruction.

GMA: The people want government that works for them at every level. They want good government that begins at their doorstep in the barangay, and does not end before the closed door of a bureaucrat in Metro Manila.
MJ: Indeed we do.

GMA: The system clearly needs fundamental change, and the sooner the better. It’s time to start the great debate on charter change.
MJ: FYI, the debate has begun years ago and time and time again, the decision has been against it.

GMA: We must address such questions as how much more government is needed for the greater safety and economic security of our people, and how much less government is more conducive to free enterprise and economic progress.
MJ: {raises an eyebrow} Sounds fishy to me.

GMA: The mode of Charter change is the exclusive prerogative of Congress. But a constituent assembly may well give our people the quickest reforms.
MJ: Quickest is not necessarily best.

GMA: I shall work with Congress, civil society groups and local government executives who are convinced that Charter changes are needed to enable the country to surmount the unprecedented challenges of the 21st century.
MJ: How about those who are not convinced?

GMA: I take this opportunity to acknowledge the local government executives who have brought about an LGU power revolution through transformative leadership.
The economic progress and social stability of the provinces, along with the increasing self-reliance and efficiency of political developments and public services there, make a compelling case for federalism.

MJ: AT LAST, something we agree on.

GMA: Perhaps it’s time to take the power from the center to the countryside that feeds it.
I recognize that our form of government will be the decision of the body constituted to undertake Charter change. But we should consider that legislation could be quickened and laws made more responsive to the people under a parliamentary system, similar to that of our progressive neighbors in the region.

MJ: What is dood for Pedro is not necessarily good for Juan. Especially if Juan’s problem is not what he has but what he is.

GMA: But even as we make a serious start in Charter change, i hope we can still work together on other initiatives to the lasting benefit of our people.
In the area of education, we’ve spent our increased resources on better trained teachers in more classrooms, teaching students in more effective ways. We’ve laid a strong foundation by building almost 30,000 classrooms in the past four years, providing computer access to more than 3,000 high schools, and beginning a “healthy start” breakfast program for our young school children.

MJ: There are 37,159 public schools in the country. Thats an average of less than one classroom per public school. And less than 10% with computers. And we’re supposed to thank you for that?

GMA: I ask Congress to pass the Pre-Need Code to rehabilitate, reform and regulate the pre-need educational programs that worked so well in the past as a major vehicle for youth education entitlement.
College education is the great Filipino dream. But in a world of rapid technological change, getting a job or keeping it depends as much on how well one reasons as how well one uses his hands. I have issued E.O. 358 so that hours spent in vocational training can be credited towards a college degree. That will combine job readiness with the dream of a college education while increasing the competitiveness of our nation.

MJ: The effectivity of both proposals remain to be seen.

GMA: But our competitiveness is greatly endangered today by the global oil crisis. I call on Congress to pass legislation encouraging renewable and indigenous energy.
MJ: It’s about time.

In the area of national security, I urge the swift passage of an anti-terrorism law that will protect rather than subvert, enhance rather than weaken, the rights and liberties that terrorism precisely threatens with extinction.
MJ: So you’re going to lessen or eradicate state terrorism?

GMA: These examples serve to highlight that there is much work to be done.
Now is not the time for divisiveness, and while there’s no avoiding partisan politics, there can be a determined effort by all sides to limit the collateral damage on a country poised for take-off.

MJ: Maybe you should have thought of that when you called up former COMELEC Commissioner Garcialliano.

Let’s call on the Lord. Let us ask Him for the grace to make us worthy of His healing our land.
Alam kong tayong lahat ay naghahangad ng isang makabuluhang pagbabago para sa ating bayan. Tayong lahat ay nagsisikap para matamo ang kapayapaan at kaunlaran. Kung kaya’t ako’y nakikiusap na tulungan ninyo ako, para sa kapakanan ng taong bayan.
We may disagree among ourselves but let us never lose sight of that greater battle for one people, one country, one Philippines.
Not the country of this or that president but the Philippines of our shared and passionate affections.

MJ: At naghahangad din kami ng katotohanan at katarungan.

GMA: Maraming salamat sa inyong lahat.
MJ: And no thanks to you.

Fact-Finding Commission

Apparently President Arroyo will push through with creating a so-called Fact-Finding or Truth Commission. Personally, I doubt the efficacy of such commission and it might just be another waste of time and money. Simply put, if only the people involved would be more honest and own up to their mistakes and repent (ie accept the consequences) for it, there would be no need for a time-consuming investigation, which might just be another venue for publicity-hungry politicians to grandstand.

And after the so-called facts have been found out, what then? Does President Arroyo and all those being investigated promise to take responsiblity for whatever wrongdoings that will be found out by the commission? Are we even sure that the so-called commission will be unbiased?

I know it’s a lot to ask from politicians to be honest. And I know it’s asking a lot to ask them to leave their posts once they have been found guilty. But isn’t it how it’s supposed to work? Have we no honest, credible and accountable politicians left? Are we really that hopeless?

Learning history lessons

According to Manuel L. Quezon III’s Blog Imee Marcos allegedly asked the Makati crowd this question: “Will we tolerate liars and thieves?” This from the daughter of the former dictator who ravished the country, looted millions of pesos and lied about everything including his own health? Is there greater hypocrisy in recent history?

And the more disturbing fact is that the people answered “NO!” LAUGHABLE!!! How about they throw tomatoes and cart off Imee Marcos and her family to jail while saying that? How about kicking the butts of the Estradas straight to jail?

Are the Filipinos really just a forgiving people or do we suffer from memory loss. Sure, most of us can recite historical dates, places and names off the top of our head at any given time. But can we say we did learn anything from our history. Studying history, theoretically and ideally, is more than just an exercise of memorization. More important than the dates, places and names are the events, the values and the ideals. More important than the date June 12, 1898, is the democracy that most of us bastardize at every turn by turning a blind eye and tolerating corruption and lack of governance. More important than the births and deaths of Jose Rizal, Andres Bonifacio, Emilio Aguinaldo and Ninoy Aquino are their lives, their ideals and the principles they fought hard for.

After countless years of independence, democracy, freedom and sovereignty, we remain slaves to our own lack of understanding and appreciation for our history and its lessons. We complain daily about the sad state of our country and how politicians have driven our country to the ground. What we fail to recognize is our part in this crisis. Would we have suffered as much if we are not so quick to forgive, forget and trust again? Would we be in the same cycle of poverty and hopelessness if we remained vigilant and prudent in choosing our leaders? Would we be asking these questions now if only we learned more than just dates, places and names from our history?

Will we continue to tolerate liars and thieves? Will we continue to victimize ourselves?

Click here for the direct link to the blog entry.

Loyalty

DENR Sec. Mike Defensor has labelled the 10 former cabinet members who resigend as being disloyal to the president. According to him, the power of the cabinet members emanate from the president who appointed them to office. Which begs the question: Is loyalty to the president of highest regard?

What Sec. Defensor has probably forgotten is that the president is not the highest power in this country. The power of the president comes from the people who elected her. And although it is the president who appoints the cabinets member, and it is the president under which they directly serve, it is not the president that they actually serve. Sec. Defensor and the rest of the cabinet were chosen and hired by the president not to serve the president herself, but the Filipino people.

Thus, the resignation of the former cabinet members should not be judged according to whether it is disloyal to the president. Rather, the resignation whould be judged as being a disservice to the Filipino people or not. This, we cannot answer right now. But for sure, we now know that Sec. Defensor’s loyalty is not for the Filipino people. And that we should be wary of.